Sometimes, I can’t help but wonder why
there aren’t more movies involving children killing children.
Well,
perhaps the above statement is a bit of a paradox because of the bit of a
paradox that intermingles with the kind of movies that have children spill the
blood of other children, and that’s the fact that there movies typically cannot
be seen by children because they are possibly too graphic and ‘traumatic’ for
children. So that bit of a paradox exists in the fact that the very actors
acting in the film, present in all the scenes with blood and murder and the
blood of children and the murder of children, isn’t legally able to actually
see the movie. A bit of a conundrum, really.
That
said, Battle Royale is definitely a movie filled with blood and murder and
gore, and almost entirely the blood and murder and gore of little children by
little children. So it really is the kind of family-friendly movie you should
totally watch with you little kid, niece, nephew, brother or sister, and have
them come out perfectly sane and happy. Except maybe for the part where he or
she tries to kill you, or thinks you are trying to kill him/her. Well, you see,
I actually believe in the independence of media from violence in children, and
all that hocus pocus, but what I’m saying is something obvious which I don’t
have to elaborate upon because you are wasting your time by reading an argument
that is obvious and has been going on for so long that I don’t want to break
into a debate yet again regarding media and violence, so it’s just best if I
stop talking about this. Or writing. Or typing.
You know things are a bit grim when this is pretty much a movie's opening shot. |
“How
violent is the film?” you ask innocently, and I say that it is fairly violent.
There has been worse before, both in the good and bad sense of the word
‘worse’, though the fact that they are little children being torn to shreds
might amp the ‘worse’ rating up a bit in people’s books… in both the good and
the bad sense, I suppose. It’s brutal and grisly and fountainous, but it seems
to straddle this thin line that exists between being violent and being ‘silly
nilly arteries are oil wells’. Some people might clutch their stomachs and moan
that it’s too much, and it perhaps is, but it also isn’t. Yes, it’s very
violent but it isn’t very violent, it’s bloody but not that bloody.
If
the above sentences were a bit perplexing then perhaps I have done a good job
of making you emulate my initial reaction to the movie. It was a whole lot of
‘what?’ followed by a bit of ‘what the fuck?’ alongside a bit of ‘FUCK!’ and a
fine dash of ‘Oooo’. Despite the simple, yet delicious, premise there’s a lot
going on in the movie. Which is good, till you realise that most of what’s
going on is also somewhat alien, and sometimes as absurd as blue whales reading
diaries to tonfa wielding chipmunks who serve Cthulu’s eldest niece’s hamster.
Which can be a bit a bit… jarring if you enter the movie like me, expecting a
grim and serious epic. It leaps around between genres and tones, without really
moving, managing to be a grim and serious drama, a school drama, a social
satire and a dark comedy all in the same breath, if not the same millisecond of
a gasp.
This overly cutesy-ily done 'Guide' is perhaps the best part of the movie. |
It might be deserted, but at least it's not a desert! Haha! Right? |
Characterization is bare-bones, but it's decent enough. |
It's all a very brutal affair. |
“How high are you, bro?” is a question I
tend to regularly get in response to my condition, to which I respond with a
resplendent ,”Expanded Universe, bro.” But what truly confuses me about my
response is the fact that I always include the ‘bro’, even when I’m talking to
a girl, which is once every time Pluto decides to become a planet again and
reunite with his old family, but that’s beside the point.
Like I said, it gets pretty absurd in spots. |
Like I said... |
“Why make something about children if
children can’t experience it?” you say with a walrus on your shoulders.
No comments:
Post a Comment