Monday, May 19, 2014

I just watched... Battle Royale

Sometimes, I can’t help but wonder why there aren’t more movies involving children killing children.
                Well, perhaps the above statement is a bit of a paradox because of the bit of a paradox that intermingles with the kind of movies that have children spill the blood of other children, and that’s the fact that there movies typically cannot be seen by children because they are possibly too graphic and ‘traumatic’ for children. So that bit of a paradox exists in the fact that the very actors acting in the film, present in all the scenes with blood and murder and the blood of children and the murder of children, isn’t legally able to actually see the movie. A bit of a conundrum, really.
                That said, Battle Royale is definitely a movie filled with blood and murder and gore, and almost entirely the blood and murder and gore of little children by little children. So it really is the kind of family-friendly movie you should totally watch with you little kid, niece, nephew, brother or sister, and have them come out perfectly sane and happy. Except maybe for the part where he or she tries to kill you, or thinks you are trying to kill him/her. Well, you see, I actually believe in the independence of media from violence in children, and all that hocus pocus, but what I’m saying is something obvious which I don’t have to elaborate upon because you are wasting your time by reading an argument that is obvious and has been going on for so long that I don’t want to break into a debate yet again regarding media and violence, so it’s just best if I stop talking about this. Or writing. Or typing.
You know things are a bit grim when this is pretty much a movie's opening shot.
                The premise of Battle Royale and the system established for the err… Battle Royale is an interesting one that is perhaps best described as a cross between a gladiatorial arena and an uninhabited vacation spot. You have an assortment of weapons both silly and deadly littering the locale like a flock of pigeons, and you get to enjoy the rolling green scenery, made further beautiful by those lovely red highlights which seem to be flowing from children lying strangely still and dismembered.
                “How violent is the film?” you ask innocently, and I say that it is fairly violent. There has been worse before, both in the good and bad sense of the word ‘worse’, though the fact that they are little children being torn to shreds might amp the ‘worse’ rating up a bit in people’s books… in both the good and the bad sense, I suppose. It’s brutal and grisly and fountainous, but it seems to straddle this thin line that exists between being violent and being ‘silly nilly arteries are oil wells’. Some people might clutch their stomachs and moan that it’s too much, and it perhaps is, but it also isn’t. Yes, it’s very violent but it isn’t very violent, it’s bloody but not that bloody.
                If the above sentences were a bit perplexing then perhaps I have done a good job of making you emulate my initial reaction to the movie. It was a whole lot of ‘what?’ followed by a bit of ‘what the fuck?’ alongside a bit of ‘FUCK!’ and a fine dash of ‘Oooo’. Despite the simple, yet delicious, premise there’s a lot going on in the movie. Which is good, till you realise that most of what’s going on is also somewhat alien, and sometimes as absurd as blue whales reading diaries to tonfa wielding chipmunks who serve Cthulu’s eldest niece’s hamster. Which can be a bit a bit… jarring if you enter the movie like me, expecting a grim and serious epic. It leaps around between genres and tones, without really moving, managing to be a grim and serious drama, a school drama, a social satire and a dark comedy all in the same breath, if not the same millisecond of a gasp.
This overly cutesy-ily done 'Guide' is perhaps the best part of the movie.
                The movie is trying to criticize-by-exposure, and the prime thing being targeted here is youth Japanese culture, by having the absurdity of their culture present in full force to the extent that it’s possible for the movie to mislead you into believing that it wants you to take it seriously. I’m writing/typing in air right now, since this absurdity and oddity is best seen to be understood, since you’re likely going to have the identical reaction of ‘erkwa?’ to it.
It might be deserted, but at least it's not a desert! Haha! Right? 
                Besides this criticism there are some interesting themes and raises some interesting questions, about the education system, ‘disciplining’ children, the military nature of education, and the conflict between older generations and newer generations moving away from past culture and tradition. These themes and questions have the potential to be profo- Shotgun? Hell yeah! The movie has a lot of action, and fairly good action at that, it might not match up well to today’s standards, but abrupt and ‘over before it started’ nature fits the brutality of the setting well. Though the fact that some of them can wield a handgun with relatively high skill is a bit perplexing when you’re sure that they have never touched one before, which might lead you into some introspective doubt regarding if this is another criticism of youth power fantasy or something, or whether the directed just wanted some awesome action with some awesome shots with awesome accuracy to make for some awesome spectacle. You see, one of the problem I had was that I started to introspect on this ‘awesomeness’ that seemed to crop up, pondering whether it had some other mysterious meaning or if it was trying to criticise something. I like to believe it was, in part, somewhat… even though I enjoyed it myself and exclaimed at intervals when heads go rolling and blood goes fountainous.
Characterization is bare-bones, but it's decent enough.
                The characters are bare bones caricatures… but they work, and the little characterisation squeezed in just barely enough to make the characters understandable enough, allowing you to distinguish between them when things get hectic. But despite all the satire and criticism-by-exposure I mentioned above, you can’t help but scratch your noggin a little when some characters just seem to suffer from a major lapse of logic or sanity or both. And when I was watching it initially the most recurring reaction on my part was ‘eh, what?’ which happened quite the number of times, and that’s not including the absurd parts of it that elicited more exciting reactions, often in all caps if push came to shove.
It's all a very brutal affair. 
                I was actually disappointed by the movie when I just finished watching it. I felt the plot could have used more exposition regarding the system, what we got is sufficient, but I just hungered for more, though it might just be because I’m a bit of an exposition junkie who often logs onto Wikia pages to just overdose on exposition till my eyes turn read, my motor control goes whack and my mind begins to slip.
“How high are you, bro?” is a question I tend to regularly get in response to my condition, to which I respond with a resplendent ,”Expanded Universe, bro.” But what truly confuses me about my response is the fact that I always include the ‘bro’, even when I’m talking to a girl, which is once every time Pluto decides to become a planet again and reunite with his old family, but that’s beside the point.
Like I said, it gets pretty absurd in spots. 
                Though in retrospect I actually find myself appreciating the movie and its little nuances and its little kinks, for better and for worse. It’s truly an odd oddity, this movie, one that tries to criticise overused tropes by using them to the point of absurdity and beyond, which becomes the very thing it seeks to talk against, while also trying to talk about several other things amidst its carnage, its glorious carnage.
Like I said... 
                All in all, I’d say it’s definitely a movie you should plunge into without any established expectations or views or opinions, and one you just let upon yourself. Of course, you have to be ready to stomach child-on-child brutality to watch it, but that’s also what makes it so gleeful.
“Why make something about children if children can’t experience it?” you say with a walrus on your shoulders.

I reply, “Go talk to Lord of the Flies and Clockwork Orange, please.” 

No comments:

Post a Comment